This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Face to face (F2F) training has sharply decreased owing to Covid. The longer that lockdowns drag on, the more that organisations will question if they ever will return to using F2F training. What this misses is that there are other important aspects of a F2F training course that are beneficial to replicate too.
Imagine you are running a training company that has successfully carved out a niche. You’re selling lots of training courses and it’s only capacity that is stopping you from selling more. One day you realise that you could increase reach, lock out competitors and reduce cost of sales if you put some of the training online.
But when used appropriately technology can enhance what happens in the training room (and afterwards). Whenever you use a role play in training this could replace it. Face to face trainers often see technology as threat or replacement of the face to face experience. Xtranormal Use this tool to create animations.
Let’s start by recognising a problem inherent to the conventional model of L&D, which I call the “interruption problem” To access L&D’s services, a learner is taken out of their workflow to go to a training course, webinar or e-learning module. accountancy e-learning legal training'
At first blush it feels like an L&D department with expertise in training should be doing more training. accountancy e-learning legal training' Conference organisers will be buoyed by this result, but there is a concern that the messages that e-learning people get at a conference are more marketing than learning.
So I almost wanted to call the police when last month I found myself reviewing training materials that made reference to the “fact” that people remember: • 20% of what they read. • 30% of what they hear. • 40% of what they see. • 50% of what they say. • 60% of what they do.
e-learning training' How can I design award-winning e-learning? I fully expect this list of questions may not cover your own questions so do pop along to the eLN stand or tweet me at viv_cole #elnevent.
When you first turned your thoughts to evaluating training, it’s odds-on that a colleague or consultant recommended you to have a look at the Kirkpatrick model. In March’s TJ, Hatty Richmond writes about her research on L&D practitioners who had been involved in evaluating training courses.
So how does this apply to training? Well, you can apply TA to delegation, business development, time management, handling potentially difficult conversations more effectively, assertiveness…pretty much any interpersonal skills training that you’re involved in. The session will be facilitated by the excellent Anne Storey.
If comfortable for this incident to be referred to on a training course or in a face to face presentation, why not in e-learning? accountancy e-learning legal training' Your people are already trusted to handle plenty of confidential information, why would you not trust them with this? What’s different?
Over many years of running Train the Trainer courses and coaching facilitators, I’ve spent time talking about learning styles e.g. Honey & Mumford and occasionally Visual, Auditory & Kinasethetic. The ELN website highlighted a clip on YouTube which I think that anyone running a Train the Trainer course should watch.
How effective is virtual classrooms training in comparison with traditional classroom training? What virtual classroom technology would you recommend? What factors influence the success or failure of virtual classrooms in terms of effectiveness? How do you change the learning culture to treat VCT as seriously as ILT?
The “conspiracy of convenience” is “that the manager comes to the training manager and says, ‘I’ve got a problem, my people need training’. The training manager says, ‘Fine, we’ll develop a training programme’. And because no-one measures it, nothing necessarily happens, but everyone’s happy.
My awakening was about face to face training and how the introductory session sets the tone. When I was working as an in-house trainer for a Big Four firm, the message from on high was that the business needed training courses to be more challenging. For the full story on what Positive Psychology is see www.cappeu.org.
accountancy legal training' UK plc needs people to think more deeply, creatively and relate to each less superficially, and most of all to break out of the negative mindset that too much news consumption engenders.
e-learning training' Journal of Business and Psychology, 27 (4), 375-394 ) found: “Findings suggest that meaningful differences among generations probably do not exist on the work-related variables we examined and that the differences that appear to exist are likely attributable to factors other than generational membership.”.
Many organisations that currently offer face to face training to clients have wrestled with the problem of what to do about blended learning and how it fits their commercial model. There are several risks that a training organisation will feel wary of when it comes to blending: Will our current staff stay on board?
In the posting Corporate eLearning’s Dirty little Secret , the results from a survey of instructional designers and developers show that using web-based training to learn about how to use authoring tools is the least popular method of learning. Vendor training. Well there’s lies, damn lies and statistics.
accountancy e-learning legal training' Often you’ll want learners to add their own favourite content so it may be appropriate to aim for 80% comprehensiveness rather than 100%. Happy curating!
He suggests that a typical ratio of organisational effort around a training course 10% pre-work, 85% learning event and 5% follow up would have greater impact if the allocation was 26% pre-work, 24% learning event and 50% follow up.
He demurred and said that the biggest emotion had been relief – he and Steve Redgrave believed that they were best in the world and had trained so hard that even if they had a bad day they would still win. training' I asked him how happy he’d felt when he’d won his Olympic Gold.
I hate to see pseudo-science such as this masquerading as fact – the sooner that training writers (and editors) stop publishing claims like this, the better for the profession as a whole.”. Whilst I’ve heard this percentage bandied about before, what was missing was anything to back it up.
As a former training manager at a Big Four accountancy firm, I know many of the pressures that you are under. Happily I make the time to read and surf publications about training and e-learning. Hi…welcome to From the Coleface, brought to you from sunny Sussex by Viv Cole.
accountancy e-learning legal training' To make a positive difference you need a great understanding of what you’re changing. It’s worth investing the time so that you can.
” e-learning training' For those of you who are unfamiliar with her, Cathy’s genius is to take a situation that really annoys e-learning practitioners and turn it into something positive that provides a workable solution.
Designers of face to face training know that there is a relatively small number of learning points that you can fit into an hour of classroom training whilst keeping things interesting and promoting interactivity.
Prensky’s metaphor of people being digital natives (intuitively understanding how recent technology works) or digital immigrants (needing support/ training in order to grasp new technology) seems wonderfully rich to me. Here’s an example from recent life.
L&D’s role will be more to facilitate the process of self-managed learning rather than being the monopolistic provider of training courses. To make best use of their time they will need to become more skilled at metalearning i.e. being more aware of how they learn best and choosing the appopriate learning approach.
If a training identifies that learners need some learning content, it typically goes through the following process. I attended a Clive Shepherd webinar today and found that one of his early slides encapsulated what I’d been reflecting upon for a while.
Are your firm’s training materials saying what’s easy, rather than what the science actually says? If only trainers were more discerning in reporting the “science bit” accurately. Are there any other bits of bad science in L&D that get your goat? Add a comment. Revise them quietly, I won’t tell…
p19: 29% see their in-house e-learning as synonymous with compliance training – they are in “the compliance e-learning cul-de-sac” p20: Targeting learning by job role. Useful checklist: “How can we make compliance training more relevant to individuals?” p48: “Thoughts for the future.”
” e-learning training' .” So when someone says “research says…” a polite enquiry may be in order…along the lines of: “Which research? Could I have the link please?”
Budget cuts have moved the goalposts; it used to be a choice of “face to face training or e-learning”, increasingly it’s a choice between “work it out yourself or e-learning” This has driven up e-learning usage and consequently driven down scepticism. It’s the recession, stupid.
It seems that in its constant desire to be taken seriously by people ‘in the business’, training professionals have been telling a few porkie pies about the scientific basis of their stories.
At a time of training budgets being cut further, good customer service seems like a way for companies to differentiate and therefore grab a larger slice of a shrinking pie. As money gets tighter, the Buffet metaphor of seeing who’s wearing swimming costumes when the tide goes out applies.
Information Transfer won “E-learning Project of the Year” from the Institute of IT Training in 2007 “Best e-learning project securing widespread adoption” at the national E-learning Awards in 2006 for e-learning that they did for the Priory Group.
Also learners may well be accessing the learning in situation where they might get interrupted e.g. the train arrives or the boarding call for the plane goes out. If you want learners to resume learning after that interruption then bookmarking is key.
training' As someone who has often questioned the value of “Employee of the week” awards and glowing profiles in newsletters, this is a welcome piece of research. It will be interesting to see how further research unpicks the nuances of effective praise in the workplace.
Not all of the time management techniques that are typically found on training courses work for everyone. Whilst our scripts may be helpful in many situations, recognising our own scripts and how to flex them is essential. Scripts give us an insight into why and the path to greater effectiveness.
Training courses and e-learning modules are longer events so you need to be careful about how you extrapolate what the generation effect says. The longer the course/ module the more that learners will get bored and frustrated by devices like this.
As an independent L&D consultant who has expertise in face to face training, e-learning and happens to be a Chartered Accountant with digital marketing experience, Linkedin allows people who are looking for my skillset to find me. It would be crazily more expensive for me to have the same reach via my company website.
Urgent projects such as change management, team building, systems training, aligning competencies and curricula. This has several implications for the L&D department in a professional firm: Reduced discretionary spend where firms are trying to make themselves look as lean as possible before a merger.
Over the years on Train the Trainer courses, I have witnessed hundreds of course delegates learn from failing to be able to give adequate instructions for a novice to make a jam sandwich or wrap a pad of Post-Its in paper. It’s well known amongst trainers just how hard it is to issue clear instructions that people can follow.
Back when I was a training manager at a big four accountancy firm, I was wary of becoming too focused on internal clients; I wanted to know what other similar organizations were doing to harness technology to improve their learning offering. I have recently completed the e-learning census of e-learning usage amongst the top 15 UK law firms.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 59,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content