This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Clark Quinn’s book Millennials, Goldfish & Other Training Misconceptions: Debunking Learning Myths and Superstitions lines up a bunch of learning myths and then knocks them down, one by one. The book is divided into three main sections, plus some intro on the science of learning and a conclusion. Learning Myths. Quick Guides.
These are my recommendations for people to follow, books to read, and other resources. As a reminder, I use Amazon affiliate links for books. I try to read a few books from the field each year. I tend to focus on either books by practitioners with a heavy practical emphasis or books with good research support.
Yet, many problems persist because they arent addressed in a structured way. Instead of relying on trial and error, the most effective leaders use proven problem-solving frameworks to break down complex issues and create lasting solutions. Apply it when writing problem statements for projects or strategic initiatives.
For more depth about the research and application of these principles, I encourage you to grab a copy of the books Multimedia Learning and e-Learning and the Science of Instruction. Likewise, if you experience an accessibility problem with this post or the course linked above, please let me know! Numbers are hard for me, y’all.
With the aid of this technology, businesses may produce individualized learning materials, such as books, articles, tests, or videos, that are catered to the specific requirements of each learner. In order to help the learner better understand calculus ideas, it can then produce more practice problems and resources.
Prior to our call, she had reviewed a number of other resources and books. What are the biggest problems currently? Are there more pictures of problems? They needed to identify which situations were problems that needed to be addressed or reported, and which situations were fine and could be ignored.
Beginning speakers, or those just establishing a brand with their first book, might earn $5,000–$10,000. Those with several books and other forms of “social proof” might draw $10,000–$20,000. Some of the results end up with bad uncanny valley problems, weird jewelry and hair, etc.
But if your business problem is relatively simple, and doesn’t require a lot of nuanced decisions, a Mastery Loop might be the best format to use. Julie Dirksen’s curated resources on systems thinking, including book recommendations and videos. There’s really only one way to get to the ending, and it’s always the best ending.
In this post, I share resources for building branching scenarios, finding the cause of performance problems, improving accessibility, creating videos, and moving from classroom to blended learning. How to quickly find the cause of a performance problem A great idea from Cathy Moore for digging into the reason for a performance problem.
Do your research–review existing training materials, online articles, books, blogs, etc. An early prototype helps catch major problems before you build the entire scenario. For whatever reason, if you’re having trouble drawing information out from a SME, start writing something yourself. Your Tricks?
This blog has helped me troubleshoot problems in a tool on multiple occasions. I own several editions of the E-Learning Uncovered Captivate books. The eLearning Uncovered Storyline 360 book is another solid reference. You can ask questions in the Adobe Captivate forum. Other Authoring Tools.
Response time matters to customers, so the speed with which agents can answer calls and solve problems is a performance measure. Forge of Empires: Inspiration for Better eLearning Feedback If you’re interested in learning more about practice and feedback, check out these books. Upcoming events Tuesday, May 16, 12:00 PM ET.
I recently mentioned that one of the problems with research is that things are more interconnected than we think. We need to accommodate complexity in learning design. (* Which I talk about in Chapter 2 of my learning science book , and in my workshops on the same topic through the Allen Academy.).
What problems do users report? Novelists and screenwriters can take years to research and write a book or screenplay.” ” “But isn’t the SME the best person to identify the situation and problem for a scenario?” The mistakes will become the distractors in your branching scenario.
The problem, it appears, was a perception that I’m deeply involved with orgs that perpetuate the problem. In the myths book , I deliberately addressed the appeal before pointing out it’s wrong (and, importantly, point to better alternatives). That, to me, is where the problem lies, and implicitly indicts the vendors.
The problem is that many of these myths seem perfectly acceptable, so we accept them uncritically. The problem is that the original model was never meant to express this. Reading a book, watching a video, or listening to a lecture are all passive activities. You can’t tell me what a book is about until you’ve read it.
Why don’t we just give learners a book and command them to read and learn? Conflict/problem. What tool did he use for the animated drawing of figures and captions? Bought on Shutterstock? Self deprecating humor, good specifics to help us visualize the setting with him. Why are we more engaged when we hear a narrative?
Christine has taught and mentored young aspiring writers to complete their books, publishing, marketing, and sales since 2007. Christine started by publishing her husband’s first book in 2004 without any of them having any prior knowledge of writing or publishing. The courses have made her more money than the books.
While this one does a (slightly) better job talking about microlearning, it is riddled with other problems. My problem, in this case, wasn’t the push for microlearning (there were some meaningful distinctions, though no actual mention how they require different design). This isn’t the only problem with this post, however.
Cathy Moore has created a new interactive online version of her flowchart to decide if a problem is best addressed through a job aid, better tools, training, or something else. I Created This Prototype For The Play To Learn Book Tour | Mel Milloway. Useful tools and resources for L&D professionals. Will training help?
Match the solution to the problem Before going out and reading articles, watching videos, and paying for online courses my advice would be to think critically about your specific needs and problems. Once you’ve determined the task and need research companies or specific technologies that address that problem.
In this session, actor and author Julie Hansen shares the must-know secrets from her new book, Look Me In The Eye: Using Video to Build Relationships with Customers, Partners and Teams. Dr. Myra Hubbard, author of the book W.I.S.E. Wednesday, April 13, 2022, 10:30 a.m.–11:30 It takes determination and commitment at all levels.
Chart based on data from Ruth Clark’s book Scenario-Based eLearning and article Accelerating Expertise with Scenario-Based eLearning. For training network engineers, I’ve done paper cutouts, stickers with icons, or digital graphics to practice making network diagrams to solve a problem in a case study.
As background, these aren’t the myths that I discuss in my book on the topic. Except many school practices are only useful for passing tests, not for actually solving real problems and meeting real goals. There’s a performance problem (or just the perception of one), and therefore a course is the answer.
That alone would be sufficient to discount this app, but there’s a second problem. Which might make sense to keep the costs of the app down, but there’s a fundamental problem with our visual architecture. Oddly enough, there are other usability problems here. (And then reengineer it when it isn’t.).
I have several speaking engagements already booked for 2023. You’ll start from the beginning, by analyzing the problem you’re trying to solve, identifying your objectives, and gathering stories from SMEs. A few additional events are in the planning stages right now.
Now this is a myth I called out in my last book (specifically on the topic of problematic beliefs). While we can differ by age, discrepancies are better explained by experience than by ‘generation’ Another problem came in an article I was connected to on LinkedIn. In it, they were making the case for micro learning.
I was extremely pleased when she referred to my Revolutionize Learning & Development book , and posted a diagram from it. I note that problem-solving, design, research, and innovation all start without a known answer, so they’re learning too!) So here’re some thoughts on the Performance Ecosystem and L&D.
"Training will help solve this problem.". Training could eventually solve this problem, but it would be more cost-effective to hire the right person in the first place. Solve the underlying motivational problem before deciding training is the solution. We pour a bunch of problems in at the top. The "Will training help?"
Several books ago, I was asked to to talk about myths in our industry. We may not even be aware of the problems with these! The problem with the latter category is that folks will eagerly adopt, or avoid, these topics without understanding the nuances. I ended up addressing myths, superstitions, and misconceptions.
An individual linked to me on the basis of a citation in a book. I didn’t know the book, so he sent me a picture of the page. On the other hand, when it doesn’t work, it can be hard to identify the problem! Then another thing was quite interesting. He also asked if I could read Dutch. Overall, it’s a win.
And there’s the problem — conventional learning objectives can work against us. Closing that gap will help solve the problem. Maybe the problem is mostly caused by bad tools, an inefficient process, lack of incentives, or some other environmental issue. Will closing the gap solve the problem? They know it.”
In her book Scenario-Based e-Learning , Ruth Clark argues that scenario-based elearning, including branching scenarios and simulations, should be used for strategic tasks rather than procedural tasks. Branching scenarios are most effective when they can show decisions that are partially correct or might be correct in certain circumstances.
We take a course, we read a book, we attend a seminar, and at the end of it, we’ve learned something! We might read something in a book, but it doesn’t “click” until we put it to practice. And this problem is only exacerbated if we try to pile on a lot of learning at once.
Tutorial videos often suffer from a Goldilocks problem: too fast and the learner can’t keep up, too slow and the learner gets bored. I once saw a guide to getting published that began: “Step 1: Write a book.” Obviously, this isn’t very helpful, unless you’re speaking to an audience that presumably already knows how to write a book.
LMS can solve this problem by providing training to any number of employees. Personalized learning experiences To address the problem of varying degrees of communication skills, organizations can use LMS platforms to customize the course and learning path based on employees’ existing skills and goals.
As I’ve cited in books and presentations, there’s evidence that L&D isn’t up to scratch. It’s a frequent symptom that the courses that are asked for have little relation to the actual problem. There are many reasons for performance problems, and a reliable solution is to throw a course at it.
For many reasons, I end up reading relevant books to our field. Wiggins & McTighe’s book is a primary argument for working backwards. Instructional differences become more apparent when evaluated from the perspective of how well the learning transfers to new problems and settings. Not everyone will see this, however.
So, the official blurb for the book talks about his tried and tested processes. Guy also is quite open about the problems facing our industry. Despite the necessity of starting as order takers (essentially, “you can’t say ‘no'”), he estimates that only 20% of the time is the problem a learning or skills problem.
As I discuss in my forthcoming book , there are nuances to each of the elements of learning design (as I also talked about for Learnnovators). In this great book, he talks about his own inspiring efforts in the context of other high-risk/high-value endeavors such as flight and construction. There are clear benefits.
Trust me, I wrote a whole book on what the research says about them! This is only part of the broader problem. Which is related to another problem, business school curricula. I do have quibbles, and one is the persistence of learning myths. There’s no reliable data that generations is a viable discrimination.
Educators around the country are confronting a new twist on an old problem: how to prevent kids from cheating when they’re taking their tests from home. While there’s no silver bullet to solving this problem, there are steps educators can take to mitigate it. Make their test open-book. Here’s where to begin.
In reviewing my forthcoming book on Make It Meaningful, I’m poring over my Education -Engagment Alignment (EEA). If learners don’t care about being a repair tech, having an objective about the problem-solving process can’t matter. I’m rewriting part to revisit it.
Admittedly, I’m part of this, what with running a course on learning science and having a forthcoming book on the topic. We’re seeing a growing awareness of the problems with bias in data sets, the limitations of ungrounded knowledge, and concerns about the human costs. . And that’s all to the good!
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 59,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content