This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Web-based products such as Claro and Composica promise to solve collaborative dilemmas and enable development teams to create engaging and interactive learning content with ease. We recently decided to test drive Claro and Composica, and here’s some of what we’ve learned in our exploration of these tools. superior workflow management.
There’s Claro, which is “traditional authoring” (fixed-pixel or shrink-to-fit), and Flow, which produces responsive content. Claro and Flow are equally powerful eLearning authoring tools focused on separate design choices. Assets within your projects can even be shared and reused between Flow and Claro.
Key Features: Slide-based interface with branching scenarios Interactive assessments and quizzes SCORM, AICC, xAPI support Pros: Highly flexible platform for custom course development Active community forum for product support Pricing: Paid Plans: From $1,499/year per user Ratings: G2: 4.6/5 5 Capterra: 4.7/5
Claro Flow – another interesting responsive e-learning development tool (from DominKnow). Register yourself on DominKnow’s website if you are interested to participate in the Claro Flow Beta Program. Links: [link] /.
dominKnow Claro – SaaS includes the ability to work on the same page with multiple people at the same time and different locations, feature set is extensive. They are also working on the mobile side of the house (I assume xAPI). Top three nominees for Authoring Tool of 2014. Has an on/off synch mobile app. Amazon Storyteller.
In the last few years, the folks at Rustici Software (already leading experts in SCORM) have worked with many partners and stakeholders in the elearning industry to develop a new standard, known as TinCan or the XAPI , that widens the scope of how online learning content can be managed and tracked by institutions and organizations.
Each of these platforms are unique, but they are not SCORM, AICC or xAPI conformant, which means the courses built on these platforms can not be exported for use in another platform or Learning Management System (LMS). . Their products Flow, Claro and Capture allow authors to store their assets and courses online.
dominKnow|ONE is an all-in-one eLearning authoring system, including Claro authoring which uses Rustici Driver to publish content in various eLearning standards. Claro also allows users to publish to SCORM Cloud with one click via PENS. Learn more about how Claro and SCORM Cloud connect here. .
There’s Claro, which is “traditional authoring” (fixed-pixel or shrink-to-fit), and Flow, which produces responsive content. Claro and Flow are equally powerful eLearning authoring tools focused on separate design choices. Assets within your projects can even be shared and reused between Flow and Claro.
There’s Claro, which is “traditional authoring” (fixed-pixel or shrink-to-fit), and Flow, which produces responsive content. Claro and Flow are equally powerful eLearning authoring tools focused on separate design choices. Assets within your projects can even be shared and reused between Flow and Claro.
With support for SCORM, xAPI, and AICC standards, Storyline integrates seamlessly with most LMS platforms to deliver engaging, trackable learning experiences. Built-in xAPI reporting provides real-time insights into learner engagement and performance. G2 Rating 4.6/5 G2 Rating 4.8/5 G2 Rating 4.8/5
Each of these platforms are unique, but they are not SCORM, AICC, or xAPI conformant, which means the courses built on these platforms can not be exported for use in another platform or a learning management system (LMS). What if your courses have features you can’t use in these environments?
dominKnow Claro. Course standards include xAPI and PENS, besides the standards of SCORM. . Next week will be the Top 10 Authoring Tools for 2016, and as you can see Claro is listed number one. Cool hold time music. Video with web cam is tight. Ideal for SMB in my opinion. Best Authoring Tool.
He is SVP of Business Development at dominKnow, the makers of the Claro authoring tool. Is it beneficial to have one that outputs to xAPI? xAPI IS important. xAPI is what will enable you ask the big business questions and get the answers. Paul Schneider, ID guru. I reached out to Paul Schneider, Ph.D.
In the last few years, the folks at Rustici Software (already leading experts in SCORM) have worked with many partners and stakeholders in the elearning industry to develop a new standard, known as TinCan or the XAPI , that widens the scope of how online learning content can be managed and tracked by institutions and organizations.
2004), HTML5, xAPI/TinCan, AICC, and LTI. The tool supports SCORM-compliant HTML5 eLearning, advanced xAPI data reporting and mobile-responsive content. This tool builds on the features of its traditional e-content development tool, Claro. They also come with their own range of eLearning formats they support, such as SCORM (1.2,
DominKnow tries to offer learning and development consultancy professionals all they need in one place, including the Claro, Flow, and Capture authoring and creation tools. Once the courses are created, they can be exported as AICC, CM15, SCORM, and xAPI. Features: Searchable Knowledge Base, web-based, CM15, SCORM, AICC, Flow, CLARO.
Tin Can/xAPI - A year ago, it wasn’t universal. Claro does the best job with it. Ability to create users/user groups, send a link for users to take a course. Mobile supported – Does not mean they offer a mobile app, or output to HTML5, but a few do. Now it is a must have. Lots of potential here. Bottom Line.
xAPI support – Hit the gas this is flying fast. How about adding an xAPI checker or something along those lines? dominKnow Claro – Always a perennial favorite of mine, but last year I felt as though they had hit the stagnation wall. Supports all mobile devices – I love it when they only show a smartphone.
Some of the integrations include PowerPoint, Moodle, LearnDash, Intuition Rubicon, and xAPI. Users will receive e-learning course authoring in Claro, responsive learning in Flow, and software lesson creation in Capture. Content can be published in SCORM, AICC, or xAPI. dominKnow is an authoring platform.
Standard adoption takes time (as we can see with xAPI), so if you are concerned or worried about having to go with CMI-5, etc. I as many folks constantly referred to xAPI as Tin Can, but recently say in the past month, I found out that Tin Can was a trademarked name by Rustici Software. – don’t. At least not for 2015. #1
Most recently I joined dominKnow, the makers of Claro, as their SVP of business development. I think xAPI has managed to do that, but I don’t see SCORM disappearing anytime soon. Before we jump into PENS, let’s begin in the authoring tool industry. In the authoring tool industry there seems to be hesitancy to go into the cloud.
LMS vendors as a whole, go forward first with responsive, then native apps, xAPI and on/off synch OR they go in an entire different order but eventually all four features are in play. . Rapid Intake three years ago, were the first ones to push output to HTML5, dominKnow Claro offers on/off synch native app besides push to HTML5 content too.
Mobile Friendly – It has taken a bit of time, but go anywhere and you will see “Responsive” and “HTML5″ xAPI – Another why wasn’t this done a year ago for many vendors? Claro by dominKnow – Strong player, who IMO got sidetracked for a bit. .
dominKnow Claro (#1), Articulate (Storyline #2 and Studio), Adobe Captivate, Lectora and their other offerings, Ancile, iSpring, Litmos Author, TechSmith, Udutu, Allen Interactions and one other I can’t recall, but they were there. In several cases I had to ask if they planned to add Tin Can (xAPI). Strange.
Industry Compliance and LMS Integration By using tools that comply with SCORM, xAPI, or other standards, you can integrate your content into your LMS and track progress effortlessly. Consider whether the tool supports multiple output formats, like SCORM or xAPI, to work with your LMS. 5 $119-$399/month Enterprises, SMBs, education 1.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 59,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content