This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Facts: Next week, the IEEELTSC xAPI TAG will be taking a vote about if and which aspects of xAPI 1.0.3 to propose to the broader IEEE for consideration as a standard. PARs will then go through the IEEE approval process over a period of several months and steps. Political intrigue. High stakes drama. Inside baseball.
Shelly Blake-Plock announced last night via LinkedIn that he would be leading a Technical Advisory Group (TAG) for IEEELTSC (Learning Technologies Standards Committee). The post IEEELTSC xAPI TAG A-OK appeared first on Experience API. This is good news, as Shelly is going to carry a real load in leading that group.
There are a bunch of other standards by ADL (who is responsible for SCORM ), IMS , IEEELTSC including CORDRAâ„¢ , LOM , Meta-data , etc. Note: ARIADNE, AICC, IEEELTSC, and IMS all participate in ADL's work on SCORM). I've also seen it in an environment that had certain restrictions on JavaScript. in the eLearning world.
The lab combined the work of existing standards organizations like the AICC , IMS and the IEEELTSC into a cohesive reference model. To solve this problem, in 1999 the government tasked a small research laboratory, ADL, to “develop common specifications and standards for e-learning.”
There’s good work happening at the IEEELTSC TAG xAPI , and we’re doing a bit of it. We’re talking about it here frequently, and haven’t reached consensus. And for that reason, I’m not making commitments and we’re not starting the process of building anything yet. We’re active, yes. But mostly, we’re patient.
As these efforts continue, likely so will standards implementations, so it’s a good idea to track the developments of the IEEELTSC group. ADL’s Total Learning Architecture (TLA) efforts are pushing for modernizing learning and integrating emerging technologies.
IEEE also specifies USB and WiFi and a host of other standards we take for granted but help ensure things “just work” as expected. I’m the chair of the part of the IEEE-LTSC (Learning Technology Standards Committee) that is looking at standardizing xAPI.
We were shocked to see how many people joined Chris Tompkins and Brian Miller on “Our IEEELTSC voting members recap 2023 and what’s next for the standards” webinar last week. The Rustici Software team regularly contributes to the evolution of the standards through involvement with the IEEE, ADL and 1EdTech eLearning standards groups.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 59,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content