Learnnovators

AUGUST 29, 2013

It is a free plug-in game from Microsoft Office Labs aimed at helping learners develop their skills in using Microsoft Office applications (Word, Excel, PowerPoint and OneNote) in a game environment. The first one on our list is ‘Ribbon Hero 2’, one of the best examples of application software gamification.

Gamification 167

Gamification Software Authoring Tools Photoshop 167

eLearning 24-7

JULY 12, 2018

A year ago I wrote about NexGen functionality in any learning system. This is to say, that any learning system vendor who tells you they are NexGen, should have Tier 1 functionality (in its entirety or at least 60% of it). If there was any learning system that screams going NexGen it is them. .

Learning System 54

Learning System System vendor Social Networks 54

Learnnovators

AUGUST 28, 2013

It is a free plug-in game from Microsoft Office Labs aimed at helping learners develop their skills in using Microsoft Office applications (Word, Excel, PowerPoint and OneNote) in a game environment. The first one on our list is ‘Ribbon Hero 2’, one of the best examples of application software gamification.

Gamification 100

Gamification Software Authoring Tools Photoshop 100

eLearning 24-7

SEPTEMBER 18, 2018

The LEP space is now the 2nd largest segment in the learning system space (LMSs are still first). One area I am seeing trend wise are learning environment and administrative features starting to mimic LMSs (not 100% in some cases, but pretty close). . Gamification is in stagnation mode in the entire learning system space. .

RFP 63

RFP Templates vendor OneNote 63

eLearning 24-7

MAY 24, 2019

Getting back to being unaware, I find the same issue with a few vendors in the learning system space who are really LXPs, but have no idea. Content Providers and other learning systems are not familiar with the LXP size, revenue potential or growth potential. However, that is for another post. Who are you?

vendor 74

vendor Propaganda LMS Standards 74

Mike Taylor

MARCH 18, 2025

Priority Content : Implement immediately; feature prominently 3.0 – 3.4 Strong Content : Implement with standard priority 2.5 – 2.9 Acceptable Content : Consider if filling specific gaps; may need enhancement 2.0 – 2.4 Borderline Content : Use only if no alternatives exist; plan for replacement Below 2.0

Toolkit 52

Toolkit Content Authoring Tools Learning Objects 52