This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
is the classic question of point-solutions vs. suites. says "create lots of easily composable, point solutions that can be mashed together." I can understand this to a degree today given the lack of standards around things like identity, but it seems pretty clear that the path is towards suites.
At one point I ordered up a truly engaging interactive and the developer with whom I worked finally resorted to a mashup of Flash squeezed into an Articulate shell to create the most creative piece to come out of the that shop. I harbor a patent dislike for packaged authoring tools like Articulate.
Authoring in eLearning 2.0 / Add-ins & Mash-ups Shift in eLearning Solutions from Pure Courseware towards Reference Hybrids Direction of eLearning Solutions - Emergence or Big System Future Platforms for eLearning Solutions View of eLearning Development Software - Ease vs. Power Point Solutions vs. Suites and Composition in eLearning Solutions (..)
Tools for Personal Learning eLearning Trend #5 - Course and Courseware Fading - The Future of eLearning eLearning Trend #6 - Emergent Systems - Direction of eLearning - Emergence or Big System , Future Platforms for eLearning eLearning Trend #7 - Composition, Add-ins, Mash-ups - Incredibly Cool! and eLearning 1.0
She sees the future of technologies supporting learning as a mash-up of social co-operation and collaboration tools aligned with the emerging social workplace. My colleague Jane Hart has written about this challenge for some years (see here for an article by Jane from 2010).
eLearning Software Satisfaction (More) - follow-up on satisfaction results for eLearning Software. eLearning Software Trends Authoring in eLearning 2.0 / Add-ins & Mash-ups - How eLearning Software is changing based on Web 2.0 Point Solutions vs. Suites and Composition in eLearning Software technical approaches.
One of the papers I will be presenting in September is entitled: "Learning Space Mash-up: Toward a Collaborative Personal Learning Environment". Thirdly, I will revisit the idea that mashup PLEs will rival and perhaps ultimately supplant the institutional Learning Management System (LMS) or VLE.
If you're a computing teacher your ears will prick up at this. It's a versatile suite of tools to support the teaching of computational thinking through the use of the programming language Python. It's a versatile suite of tools to support the teaching of computational thinking through the use of the programming language Python.
Once we've interacted to some level, you might consider linking up with my via LinkedIn - I found this to be a good way to stay connected with people. Start-Up Guides Personal and Group Learning Using Web 2.0 Informal Learning, Communities, Bottom-up vs. eLearning 2.0 - An Immediate, Important Shift eLearning 1.0, eLearning 2.0
Without curation, courses quickly become abandoned, content grows stale, and training becomes a mish-mash of tips and advice without any coherent organization. Once someone takes the time to vet the content, organize it, distribute it, and follow up, any savings might well be outweighed by costs in terms of time spent.
It's one of a suite of papers Maged Boulos and I have been working on with colleagues around the world over the last 3 years, and this one is particularly exciting because it shows how to harness Web 2.0 social software: An enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and healthcare education. Keywords: Social Web; Web 2.0;
More about Todd here: [link] Below are excerpts from the interview: What are some of the key eLearning trends that you think would surface, or pick up, in 2016? Whether “big education” follows suit is anyone’s guess – but it is pretty desperately needed, based on what I’m hearing from university and college students.
If you are seeking a system that is a mash-up of useful business tools with a strong LMS, than this is a system to examine. Their ideal market honestly is education, but they as many other VLPs have realized that corporate is a delicacy that cannot be passed up. Well, that’s good because I just made it up.
From the University of Innsbruck, Tilmann Märk in the report, ‘Microlearning: an emerging field in science,’ states, “Freeing Microcontent from its container allows for all kind of new ways of using, reusing, hashing, mixing and mashing content. Microlearning suits the needs of everyone. Sources: [link].
And not just in the C-suite, but across the entire organization. For far too long, most leadership development programs have been disconnected from real work, lacking any relevant context, mashed together with inconsistent curricula, and, in the end, they don’t directly impact executing on organizational strategy.
GenY have grown up with rich-media and have a significant difference in attitude from the Gen X. People will want to create and communicate and do this quickly and without “due process” Authoring tools will need to support mashups, but I suspect that tools themselves need to be created as a mash-up of tools.
They continue to muddle up the learning system space. The same of seats for X group for this content, Y for this, buy all or not, followed suit. A vendor who is savvy will now push the “learning suite” angle, something I strongly recommend. When it comes to metrics tied around skills, it continues to be a mish-mash.
According to a 2011 Forrester Research report, “Informal Learning Garners Acceptance as a Legitimate Learning Approach,” 76 million millennials will make up 47 percent of the 2014 workforce and will soon become middle managers. C-suite positions will also draw from an additional 46 million Gen Xers.
If you want the longer version, you can review past criteria, mash it up, and extract key details. The goal of FAL is to have the best systems, the nextgen systems and the systems that are up and coming, and we continue to do that, but it is never a requirement. The Criteria. Below is the crib notes version. Affordable system.
Often times course creators and membership site owners will get invested in the nitty gritty details of what individual tools can do for their sites before putting up a minimum viable product to see if anyone indicates interest in what they have to offer. Chris Badgett: Tell us a little bit about your background with Infusionsoft.
This is somewhat like Authoring in eLearning 2.0 / Add-ins & Mash-ups and Typepad Widgets - A Sign of Things to Come in eLearning Authoring / Developement. But I think that the idea of LAMS but based on composition is also inline with this future Point Solutions vs. Suites and Composition. What's the bottom line?
Learn about how one can scale up his or her course and membership sales in 3 years in this LMScast episode with a blue-collar dude at heart named Josh Hall, hosted by Chris Badgett from LifterLMS. He took a counterintuitive approach by signing up with James Schramko , the author of Work Less, Make More. and LifterLMS. Josh Hall: Yeah.
Once the thrilling conclusion (no spoilers) passed, I was so wound up, not even a dancing bear could have calmed me down. Sometimes, when you want to get someone’s attention, you need to put on a clown suit and slap them between the eyes with a rubber chicken! Okay, I tell a lie – the dancing bear worked a treat!
I’ll be up front here. Change it up. ” I’d say, “Ahh, here is the proof that the design was horrible and the requirement of linear learning set up the course to fail.” And here’s the thing, they are not only doing it right now, but others will follow suit. “The Truth?
This webcast will clear up some of the confusion and provide a window into how coaching can help, and explore how to build an effective coaching culture in your organization. Join Sharlyn Lauby, CPLP, for a discussion on the five practical tips to use when developing a management onboarding program that will set new managers up for success.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 59,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content