This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Before we get into how SCORM, Tin Can (also called xAPI, or Experience API), and AICC are different, let’s start with what they all have in common: a complicated acronym (AICC is a doozy), and standards and specifications for eLearning content that is compatible across multiple platforms. What is AICC? What is SCORM?
The first official eLearning content standard, AICC was developed by the Aviation Industry CBT Committee in 1993 as a CD-ROM based standard. A predecessor to SCORM, AICC was difficult to work with and many steps were required to get content in the format running in a learning management system (LMS). Gamification. Interoperability.
Companies should be wary of the value a “free” learning platform can deliver and alert to the costs quickly accrued in maintaining, updating and supporting an LMS without a vendor. Despite its low cost and flexibility, Moodle’s weaknesses can make it a costly choice for companies with conflicting needs and requirements.
Before we get into how SCORM, Tin Can (also called xAPI, or meaning Experience API), and AICC are different, let’s start with what they all have in common: a complicated acronym (AICC is a doozy), and standards and specifications for eLearning content that is compatible across multiple platforms. What is AICC? What is SCORM?
I have been told the new UI will launch in early 2013. SCORM/AICC. SCORM/AICC. Also sells a Knowledge Management Platform, which can be added to LMS for an additional cost. Data warehouse (additional cost). Features include: E-commerce at no additional cost. The same applies to the admin side.
Here is how these new rankings will work throughout 2013: Debut this month, update in July, final top 25 in Dec. This solution reminds me of Articulate Studio in terms of its capabilities, but at a lower cost. and SCORM/AICC. They are reporting that in March 2013 you will be able to output to HTML5.
2013 - LMSs are not the only learning system in town. This is typically an additional cost – i.e. having an actual human (which is how it works) transcribes your video. Always an additional cost. 264, MP4, MOV, WMA, AICC, etc. Video V-Costs. Beta folks still waiting for Beta to return. Ooyala, Nov.
Plus, if they system accepts other SCORM types or AICC or xAPI, you will never see those mentioned or listed. I found the very first one I wrote – in 2013. There is always cost to this, but do not assume that a lower priced system or a system you would never think will do this, because there are plenty who do.
In October 2013, an eLearning Guild report showed the most common authoring tools were Adobe Captivate, TechSmith Camtasia, Articulate Storyline, Articulate Studio, and Trivantis Lectora, and those tools are still leaders in this market. Is there a preference or reason for choosing xAPI, AICC, SCORM over the other? Course Design.
For this year’s forecasts, I reviewed and analyzed the data – not only for 2014, but 2013 too. One of the most interesting items which presents to me an unknown variable is CMI-5, a compliance standard (formally with AICC) now headed up by ADL. In other words for them to add that API there is no cost. Calculations.
Developed in 2013 (then known as Project Tin Can), xAPI was created to be the successor of SCORM , the most widely used learning specification form. Tracks rich data for better ROI analysis SCORM and AICC only allows you to capture specific LMS data. However, the implementation cost of these tools is really high for universities.
Development costs influence WBT design. When businesses consider training an expense that marginalizes profit, it is natural for the organization to search for the best low cost solution. In a profit-or-loss paradigm, one would agree that “best” cannot include anything that increases time, cost or effort. People enjoy elearning.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 59,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content